So, we've used a bunch of model railroad-related products (and many others that weren't originally intended for model railroad use); now it's time to tell what we think about them.
It's sticky, it's goopy, it's messy, and it sometimes cures so hard you'll never know the two pieces were once separate. Here are the stories on the adhesives we've tried.
I like to read, especially using the extra time I have at lunch after I'm done eating. Here are some thoughts on books that I've read recently.

I recently finished reading Playing With Trains - A Passion Beyond Scale by Sam Posey. I received a paperback copy of the book as a Christmas gift this year, and as I had just finished reading Rumpole and The Penge Bungalow Murders, another similarly sized book seemed to fit well into my reading list. Overall, the book was a pleasant diversion through one man's experiences in learning about model railroading and building his own home layout, but I was left both wanting to read more about the layout and with a rather pessimistic view of the hobby's future.
In Playing With Trains, we are autobiographically taken through the life of a model railroader from his first Lionel set as a pre-teen through the discovery of scale modeling, finally settling on a specific prototype and era and constructing and operating a layout to fit it. At various points along the journey, there are detours to provide a little historical background on, for example, a brief history of Lionel train development and the construction of the Colorado Midland Railroad. The reader is also invited to tag along on the author's visits to the railroad empires of some of the hobby's more well-known participants like Tony Koester, George Sellios and Malcom Furlow. There's a small section of photos in the middle of the book that shows vignettes of the various "finished" layouts that are visited in the text.
Although the author splits the contents into two parts, in reading it I thought it worked better in three parts: the author's youth, building the Colorado Midland layout and examining other modelers' approaches to the hobby. Each part is written with readers who are not necessarily modelers in mind.
The book overall is an easy read, even for people who aren't model railroaders. He doesn't go into too great detail on the more technical aspects of building a model railroad, but adds enough (and explains the more esoteric terms and concepts) that the reader is able to understand what he's working on and how he's doing it. The story itself flows logically from his first childhood Lionel layout through building (although not really planning) his version of the Colorado Midland in HO scale to what appears to be the present. The author presents a wide range of modeling styles through visits to other well-known modelers' layouts and refrains from stating that any one style is "best"; rather, they are described merely as different ways to participate in this wide-ranging hobby.
I wouldn't say that there was really anything bad about the book, but as a model railroader myself, I wanted to read more about the technicalities of the model railroad. In the book he wrote that the layout was featured as a cover story in a past issue of Model Railroader Magazine, but didn't explicitly say which issue it was; I had to run over to the Model Train Magazine Index to find out that it was the February 1995 issue. He also wrote about a followup article titled The Magic of Illusion, and it was back to the index to find it in the December 2001 issue.
I also would have liked to see more photos throughout the book rather than a smattering of pages segregated to the middle of the text. I would especially have liked to see more photos of the layout as it was being built. The author tells us all about the photos that he took during his layout's construction, but there are only a select few in the image gallery.
Toward the end of the narrative, the author describes the current state of the hobby. The mood turns a bit somber here as the author laments the fact that so many model railroaders are beyond middle-aged and will soon be leaving the hobby to hang out in the great crew lounge in the sky. He also takes some words to describe the attendees at a model railroad show, but rather than looking at the great number of people attending the show, we get a description of the sometimes over-obsessed railfan and modeler that we've all seen drooling over the layouts at a show. In the Epilogue and Acknowledgements at the end of the book, we discover that the editor thinks of the entire hobby as an obsession and its participants as people that do not quite fully fit in to normal society. All together, I was left with a sense of foreboding ill for the future of the hobby.
The strong opening and layout construction sections seem to fall on their face a little as the author moves into describing where the hobby could be heading. I was left at the end with more of a sense that model railroading is a hobby that is losing practitioners faster than it is gaining them. Seeing the large number of excited children at some of the train shows that I attend, however, I'm not sure if that's really the most accurate assessment for the hobby. But, in the way it was presented in the book seems to be the opposite of the showmen's creed "always leave the audience wanting more."





So, to put a number on it based on a scale of 1 to 5 spikes where 5 spikes is best, I guess this would rate 3½ spikes. I enjoyed reading about the layout development and construction, and I wanted to go through my library of Model Railroader back issues to find and read the author's two articles, but the mood turned a little too somber for me at the end of the book. If you receive it as a gift, it's worth reading, but given my own experience reading it, I don't think that you need to buy it unless you really want to.
Your trains need something more than a string tied to the couplers to get them moving. These are some of the locomotives we've tested.
Your model freight and passengers don't move themselves, they're carried in your model rolling stock. Here's what we think of our rolling stock.
Whether they come in kit form or built-up, commercial structures get checked out here.
So there are a lot more products and services that we use as model railroaders. Here are a few that we've had a chance to write about...
Okay, so I've been busy and not getting anything posted here for quite a while. Well, a new toy arrived in the mail today. It's called "Lens in a Cap" and it gives me a near pinhole aperture on a very small lens. The entire lens is about the size of a body lens cap and it has a setting for f/64. While it's almost impossible to see through the lens to compose an image with the aperture so small, using that and the optional Lubot 10x loupe, I got some amazing macro shots of some models....
All of the models that I shot are N scale factory painted, unmodified models.
The first model that I shot was an unlettered Atlas GP9 in Union Pacific style yellow and grey (Milwaukee Road used this paint scheme on their later passenger trains too).

Next, I grabbed a MicroTrains covered hopper...

For comparison, I next looked at a Precision Masters covered hopper.

For a little something different, I looked at Athearn's N scale fire truck.

The last model I looked at today was a LifeLike C-Liner.

I bought the Lens in a Cap with model railroad photography in mind, and after trying it out today, it looks like it will become a handy tool when I really get into superdetailing and painting my models. If I can get the flaws so they aren't noticed at this range, they'll really look great on the layout.
Long time readers of this site will know that I had hoped to put up one review per month. Obviously, I'm far short of reaching that goal. So, I think it's time for an update on the items that I'm looking at for review material. Rather than an in-depth on each item, I'll give you a quick first impression on each item. (Read more to see my initial thoughts)
There have been quite a few letters written to various publications about the National Model Railroad Association (NMRA) and its value to the average modeler. Many of the letters that I've seen boil down to the question "what's in it for me?" For me, personally, there's quite a lot in it. So why did I join the NMRA and why do I stay a member? Read more to find out...
One of the core responsibilities of the NMRA is to develop standards for the hobby. The most visible result (although not an official standard) is probably also the most put-down, the HO scale X2F (the "horn-hook") coupler. Yeah, the horn-hooks are wildly out of scale and look pretty bad when compared to some of the more modern knuckle couplers, but what if this standard didn't exist?
Without the X2F, model manufacturers could each build their own style of couplers for the models that they create in an effort to "lock-in" hobbyists to their particular couplers. The couplers from competing manufacturers very likely would not be interoperable, and don't even think about converting them because every item of rolling stock would have its own method of attaching the couplers. You'd have to maintain a fleet of coupler conversion cars in order to operate all your equipment at any time. With all these conversion cars, you wouldn't be able to have anything remotely similar to prototype switching in operating sessions.
What's happening today is that so many HO scale modelers have chosen to use Kadee's coupler for any of a number of reasons, and now that Kadee's patent has expired, the coupler market is beginning to resemble the hobby before the X2F. Some brands of knuckle couplers do not mate well or do not mate at all with other brands. We're also starting to see the same issue appear in N scale models with so many modelers opting for MicroTrains' couplers. I've spoken with a couple NMRA officials at various levels about this (among other topics); the NMRA sees the potential for a fractured market and has begun the process of re-taming the new coupler market.
For a more recent example of the NMRA's standardization work, take a look at the current DCC market. While it's not perfect, and there are some brands of decoders that work best with the same brand of base station; but as a new DCC user myself, I can purchase the base system that best fits my needs and add decoders from almost any manufacturer. It wasn't very long ago that this was not the case, but again, thanks to the work of the NMRA, I can more easily and affordably convert my own home layout to DCC.
The NMRA's Kalmbach Memorial Library, in a wing of the national headquarters building in Chattanooga, is a world-class specialist library. In the library's collection are more than 7,000 books, more than 100,000 photos and a huge amount of magazines, plans, videos, timetables and other reference material of railroad and model railroad subjects.
As an NMRA member, I get expedited answers to any research requests that I make. My requests are also at a significant discount off other research requests. I also get discounts on books published by the library, and if I'm at the National Train Show, I can usually pick up a copy right there at the NMRA Company Store to save the shipping cost.
Through my own membership in the NMRA, I've had the opportunity to travel to many parts of the US that I might not have visited on my own. Call me a convention junkie, but I always have a great time at every NMRA convention that I go to, be they regional or national. Sure, there are incidents like the shuttle bus that my wife and I rode back to our hotel from the convention hotel where the driver almost took us the wrong way on the Pennsylvania Turnpike because he wanted to give us a shortcut to our hotel (not to mention the infamous Pink Tour at the same convention or the bus that destroyed its oil pan while driving into an open pit mine on another convention tour five years later, both tours that we were fortunate enough to miss).
The first convention I attended was the 1991 regional convention in Sacramento, California, which was held in conjunction with Railfair '91. On that trip we got to see so much more of the rail scene in northern California than we would have otherwise known about or been able to see. Since then, on the national convention level, we've been to Valley Forge, Long Beach, St. Louis, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Toronto, Seattle and the last weekend of Cincinnati, as well as Madison where we were able to participate as part of the host division. My wife and I are currently planning our visit to Detroit in 2007, where we'll also launch a second vacation to celebrate our 15th anniversary (already!). Looking further ahead, we're planning to attend the Anaheim and Milwaukee conventions (and I was already asked two years ago if I would present a couple clinics in 2010), and I'd love to go to Sacramento in 2011 as this would be 20 years after our first convention experience and in the same city, no less!
If I didn't go to these conventions, I wouldn't have been able to see as many home layouts as I have, and I would never have been able to gain the access to industrial areas at anywhere near the same quantity or quality as the tours I've been on. I might have made a vacation to the DelMarVa area if I wasn't attending the conventions, but I don't think I would have selected some of the other locations we've been to without the conventions.
One of the more visible modeler programs of the NMRA is the Achievement Program. Through it, modelers are given a challenge to produce a number of exceptional quality models, which, if enough certificates are earned, leads to the Master Model Railroader achievement level.
At the 2006 Midwest Region spring convention in Schaumburg, I officially took the role of Region Model Contest Co-Chairman. As a direct result of this, I get to look at and judge many more models than I would have been able to view before. I can see examples of all the flaws that modelers get knocked for when they submit models for judging.
When we moved to the Midwest, my wife and I joined the NMRA. We were invited to attend the monthly meetings of the Rock River Valley Division. We were very warmly welcomed and very soon found ourselves involved in operating sessions, railfanning events and a number of other outings. Getting this involved in the local model railroad scene would have taken an extreme amount of time longer than it did had we not joined the NMRA. The events listing in the back of the national magazines really doesn't do much more than scratch the protective plastic lining off the plexiglass surface of the hobby. Sure, attending the events listed there can show you some of the portable layouts in an area, but you really don't know an area's modelers until you get involved.





In my own experience, joining the NMRA is the most absolutely worthwhile investment that I have made in model railroading to date, and it continues to pay off in rewards that I wouldn't have known about without it. It's expanded my own knowlege of railroad history and modeling techniques and helped enliven a lifelong passion that I'm more than happy to share with my family. So, on my rating scale of 0 to 5 spikes, with five being best, NMRA membership for me rates a full five spikes.
Happy modeling, and see you at the conventions!